Why Millennials Matter

After 74 posts on the values, purchase habits and preferences of Millennials, it's probably worth a short post on what I hope should be obvious by now: why it matters what Millennials think. Not only is this generation similar in size to the Boomers, they have enormous purchasing power. Today's 18-29 year old has an average income of $29,000, and their earning power is growing faster than for other age cohorts. Most important, Millennials are meaningfully different in their values. Those differences will increasingly come to define products, marketing approaches and politics for the entire country. (p. 209)

Let's start with politics. In their terrific (and prescient) book, Millennial Makeover, Winograd and Hais write:

"Political behavior resarch has consistently indicated that once most individual, and hence most generations, take on a party identification, they maintin it throughout their lives. As sociologist J.V. Namenorth noted, "Value orientations do not change much during a generation's life time. Committed during its early stages a generation most often carried its value commitments into the grave". If the Democrats can maintain this initial generational allegiance during the next two presidential elections, they should gain a decisive electoral edge for decades to come."

Likewise, marketers know that brand affinities established early in a consumer's life can persist for decades. This is why Bride's magazine stays so fat year after year.

With so much at stake tomorrow, it's little wonder marketers need to find what moves Millennials today. Some of their lifetime values are already becoming clear: Tolerance, the environment, authenticity, family, global perspective, team-work, immediacy, ethics. Others are still emerging. It remains to be seen how the current financial crisis will shape their career aspirations and life goals. Certainly there are fewer MBA's looking for a career in investment banking this week, than a month ago. And the dream of homeownership may not be as compelling for today's young people as for Gen X.

Millennials vs. Boomers: Hogwarts as Metaphor?

I highly recommend Millennial Makeover by Winograd and Hais (Rutgers Press, 2008). While the focus is political, there is plenty of useful data for marketers, much of it from familiar sources like Pew (see previous blog post). My reason for recommending it, however, is their use of the data to address the question, 'Are Millennials just younger versions of previous generations or are they really different'? The arguments they put forth are compelling. According to the authors

"... media moguls, authors and even politicians make the fundamental error of thinking that today's young people think and act just like they did when they were young. Nothing could be further from the truth."

They ask us to think of Millennials as a generational cohort made up solely of Harry Potter and his plucky friends, and to contrast them with the adults at Hogwarts, the scowling, often clueless faculty and ministry of magic administrators. While Harry and his team (key word) work hard to save the world, applying special ingenuity and talents, the grown ups they must contend with are "individualistic, judgmental egotists who talk more than they act."

Millennial professionals who participated in two online focus groups, to our surprise, expressed a similar view of Boomers. When asked who they prefer to work with, all said they preferred to work with other Millennials (no surprise there), and they MUCH prefer to work for Gen X'ers over Boomers. This was indeed a big surprise to us, after all that has been written about the supposed natural affinity between Millennials and Boomers. Boomers are considered to be like their parents, pretty old fashioned and out of touch. One young brand manager at Unilever even shared with us that there is a 'reverse mentoring' program in place at his company, where Millennials share their technology wizardry insights with older, less adept Boomers. In contrast, they feel as if they have more to learn from Gen X'ers and that X'ers are more willing to take the time to teach them what they need to know.

Winograd and Hais would find this no surprise, contending that indeed X'ers and M'ers have more in common with each other than they do with the 'idealist' Boomers who bear responsibility for years of political gridlock and ultimately pointless culture wars.